Conjoined twins have always fascinated scientists. So when an ancient grave was discovered at Angel Mounds with two babies buried together heads facing away, hands joined and legs intertwined, the archeologist who discovered it speculated the babies were conjoined twins. More than 70 years later, scientists tested his hypothesis with DNA analyses. They found that not only were the babies not conjoined twins, but they were not even related.

Conjoined twins

Conjoined twins are a rare congenital abnormality that occurs when a single fertilized egg partially splits into two fetuses (as opposed to completely splitting into two and resulting in identical twins). The most famous conjoined twins in history were Chang and Eng Bunker from Siam (now Thailand). This is where the expression ‘Siamese twins’ comes from.

Approximately half of conjoined twins are stillborn. An additional third die within the first 24 hours. The connection between conjoined twins and the number of organs they shared can vary significantly. Sometimes conjoined twins have fused skulls but separate bodies, or they may be fused at different areas of the body.

Sometimes it’s possible to separate conjoined twins by surgery, especially if they don’t share vital organs. Chang and Eng Bunker, for example, were only joined by flesh, cartilage and their livers. If born in the modern times, they could have easily been separated.

Twins rare in prehistoric times

Even though it’s likely that at least a small proportion of conjoined twins were born in prehistoric times, there’s no archeological records to confirm such cases. Records of twin births are equally rare. The earliest confirmed case of twin births comes from the Neolithic Era (8000 years ago) of a woman who died with her twins at childbirth.

This may be why the discovery of the alleged conjoined twins at Angel Mounds generated so much interest, and a sense of mystery.

Discovery of the alleged conjoined twins

Angel Mounds was a palisaded Middle Mississippian agricultural village in Indiana from around A.D. 1050 – 1400. In 1941, the Indiana archeologist Glenn A. Black was leading an excavation that discovered two skeletal infants buried in a single grave.

Based on the position of the two skeletons, Black hypothesized the infants were conjoined twins. He suggested that they were “flesh-joined” twins, as there was no evidence to support that they shared any organs or limbs.

Black’s conjoined twins were so legendary at Indiana University that 70 years later, a professor at the university (Charla Marshall) decided to test Black’s theory using DNA analyses.

Sketch image of the skeletons that were thought to be of conjoined twins
Sketch image of the skeletons of the persumed conjoined twins. (Image from Marshall et al. (2011) Am J Phys Anthropol)

DNA analyses to confirm their relationship

The confirmation of identical twins (and hence conjoined twins too) relies on the analysis of nuclear DNA, as identical (and conjoined) twins are the only individuals that share exactly the same DNA.

Even non-identical twins have differences that we can detect using genetic techniques. However, obtaining good quality nuclear DNA from ancient samples can be tricky, as each of our cells only contain two copies of the nuclear DNA genome, hence DNA degradation can reduce the DNA quantity and quality relatively quickly.

Unfortunately, the researchers of the Angel Mound twins were unable to obtain enough nuclear DNA for the genetic analyses. Instead, they turned to mitochondrial DNA.

Mitochondrial DNA testing

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is very useful for studying ancient samples because we each have hundreds to thousands of copies of the mtDNA genome in most of our cells. This means the likelihood of obtaining quality mtDNA is a lot higher than the likelihood of obtaining quality nuclear DNA.

DNA Maternal Ancestry Test box

DNA Maternal Ancestry Test

MtDNA is maternally inherited (passed from mother to child) and is useful for tracing maternal lineages. People from the same maternal line (such as mother and child, or siblings, or twins) share the same mtDNA profile.

Based on Black’s conjoined twins’ theory, Charla Marshall was expecting the twins to share the same mtDNA profile. However, to their surprise, each of the infants had a different mtDNA profile. This meant that the two infants were not even full siblings, let alone conjoined twins.

The reason behind co-burial

If these two infants were not maternally related why were they buried together? It is possible that the infants were half-siblings with a common father. But, this could not be confirmed due to the poor quality of nuclear DNA.

Also, approximately 3-5% of all burials at Angel Mounds were co-burials and group burials. A majority of these do not share common mtDNA profiles. This suggests that a maternal relationship wasn’t a requirement for group burials in ancient Midwestern societies. The reason behind why ancient Mississippians chose to bury unrelated people together, such as these two famous “conjoined” infants, remains a mystery.

The DNA tests conducted in this study have identified two different mtDNA profiles from the Mississippian population of A.D. 1050 – 1400. If you have taken the DNA Maternal Ancestry Test, you can compare your results against these remains to see if you share a similar profile.


Marshall C et al. (2011) Brief Communication: Conjoined Twins at Angel Mounds? An Ancient DNA Perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol. 146: 138–142.